Here's a neat short article about them.
Here's another article with some more details about her life.
09 August 2012
Neat Article on Allyson Felix's Father
Most everyone knows that Allyson Felix won the gold medal in the women's 200m in London. Not many know about her dad. He's a professor at John MacArthur's Master's Seminary.
Here's a neat short article about them.
Here's another article with some more details about her life.
Here's a neat short article about them.
Here's another article with some more details about her life.
01 August 2012
You Cheat, You Lose
I'm very amused by some of the reactions to the expulsion from the Olympic Games of 8 badminton players who cheated. (Yes, cheated...purposefully losing a match to improve your draw in the next round is cheating.)
Then, in a classic effort of self-justification, some are blaming the problem on the tournament format. That's like Adam blaming God for giving him the woman. Didn't work then, won't work now.
Here's a summary story.
Then, in a classic effort of self-justification, some are blaming the problem on the tournament format. That's like Adam blaming God for giving him the woman. Didn't work then, won't work now.
Here's a summary story.
30 July 2012
Why I'll Never Rent a Car from Hertz Again (and neither should you)
Long story short: I rented a car from Hertz when we were in Seward, Alaska on vacation. There's a notice of a mileage restriction buried in fine print in the contract. I had a conversation with the rental agent about where I was going, which was well over the mileage limit. She never mentioned it to me.
I was charged more than an additional day's rent for our pleasure drive over to Kenai. The rental agent at the desk when I returned the car admitted they messed up, but wouldn't fix the problem.
Of course Corporate just stood behind legal language rather than engaging in even minimal customer service.
Don't rent from these people...you'll regret it. I certainly did.
And I should add how friendly and customer oriented the folks at both Avis and Enterprise were when I rented later in the trip.
I was charged more than an additional day's rent for our pleasure drive over to Kenai. The rental agent at the desk when I returned the car admitted they messed up, but wouldn't fix the problem.
Of course Corporate just stood behind legal language rather than engaging in even minimal customer service.
Don't rent from these people...you'll regret it. I certainly did.
And I should add how friendly and customer oriented the folks at both Avis and Enterprise were when I rented later in the trip.
23 July 2012
(Some Of) The Problems With the NCAA Sanctions Against Penn State
The recent announcement of NCAA sanctions against Penn State regarding the sex abuse scandal are very disturbing. Here's a few of the reasons why-
1) Too soon- The NCAA is famous for taking too long to make final rulings on athletic scandals. The complaints are not unjustified...Reggie Bush was almost to NFL retirement before SoCal got the word on what the sanctions would be with reference to the improper benefits he received. Part of the reason they took so long on these various decisions is due to the nature of the beast: asking people with full-time 'real' jobs to meet and make important decisions affecting hundreds of other people is simply not a time-efficient process. But part of the reason was also a good one-they were thorough. They gathered all the facts that could be gathered from all the pertinent people and made a decision based on the data, with enough time passing that emotions played no role in most cases (the SMU death-penalty decision could be argued otherwise, but that's another blog post).
2) Punishing the wrong people- A decision that involves a sixty million dollar fine will have serious financial repercussions on a lot of good folks who had nothing to do with the wrongs that occurred, and could have done nothing to prevent or stop them. Keeping PSU out of conference championships and bowl games will cost hard-working folks their jobs. In short, what happened was, they caught the serial killer and summarily executed his family and friends as punishment.
3) Not punishing the right people- Perhaps one of the biggest problems, one that hasn't gotten much mention, is that a hurry-up-and-make-them-pay attitude not only hurts quite a number of folks who don't deserve to be punished, it may very well end up letting the very, very guilty walk away without so much as a sneer. Allowing the hurried and not-so-impartial Freeh investigation to stand in place of a long-term, outsider-with-no-connections investigation will likely mean that some of the underlings in the system who did know about the crimes and could have stopped them but chose not to do anything, walk away without anyone ever knowing their names or their culpability. University presidents make important decisions, and should be held accountable for what happens when they cover up a crime. But those people in the locker rooms who allowed the crimes to continue should not get away without justice, having had their bosses stand in their place at the whipping post.
4) Frightening precedence- The NCAA has acted upon and punished a violation of criminal law. I understand the argument about how they aren't punishing the perpetrator (who's name I refuse to put in print) but punishing a 'lack of institutional control' instead. I don't buy it. If that were the case, the same due process that we've seen in the past would take place, and the punishment would fit the 'crime'. (Funny how flippantly we use that word when it really doesn't apply.) That didn't happen here because retribution doesn't feel good after everybody has gotten past the emotions of an injustice. It only feels good when there's still blood in the (shower) water. What the NCAA did was eye-for-an-eye legalism at its finest. I don't think the NCAA should be operating that way. Those people are charged with stopping cheating in collegiate athletics (which they absolutely have not done, but again, that's another blog post). Giving them the precedent to deal with criminal activity, even when restricted to a university setting, should scare the scat out of all of us.
There is a lot more that could be said, but I'll save some of it for later. Right now, we have two sets of victims to deal with- the real victims of the sexual perversion of the perpetrator of the child rape and abuse, and now the fabricated (but real) set of victims (albeit less severe consequences) of those who are drawing blood from innocent people in the effort to cover their rear ends, stick it to 'the man', or in some way try to feel better about themselves in the aftermath of a tragedy. And in the process, the first set of victims (the serious ones) may get overshadowed by all the brouhaha. That would be a third tragedy, but I fear it is unavoidable at this point unless cooler heads prevail.
Let's try and focus on punishing the guilty and supporting the victims rather than hurt a bunch of folks who didn't do anything wrong in the effort to feel better about our (in)actions in light of the scandal.
1) Too soon- The NCAA is famous for taking too long to make final rulings on athletic scandals. The complaints are not unjustified...Reggie Bush was almost to NFL retirement before SoCal got the word on what the sanctions would be with reference to the improper benefits he received. Part of the reason they took so long on these various decisions is due to the nature of the beast: asking people with full-time 'real' jobs to meet and make important decisions affecting hundreds of other people is simply not a time-efficient process. But part of the reason was also a good one-they were thorough. They gathered all the facts that could be gathered from all the pertinent people and made a decision based on the data, with enough time passing that emotions played no role in most cases (the SMU death-penalty decision could be argued otherwise, but that's another blog post).
2) Punishing the wrong people- A decision that involves a sixty million dollar fine will have serious financial repercussions on a lot of good folks who had nothing to do with the wrongs that occurred, and could have done nothing to prevent or stop them. Keeping PSU out of conference championships and bowl games will cost hard-working folks their jobs. In short, what happened was, they caught the serial killer and summarily executed his family and friends as punishment.
3) Not punishing the right people- Perhaps one of the biggest problems, one that hasn't gotten much mention, is that a hurry-up-and-make-them-pay attitude not only hurts quite a number of folks who don't deserve to be punished, it may very well end up letting the very, very guilty walk away without so much as a sneer. Allowing the hurried and not-so-impartial Freeh investigation to stand in place of a long-term, outsider-with-no-connections investigation will likely mean that some of the underlings in the system who did know about the crimes and could have stopped them but chose not to do anything, walk away without anyone ever knowing their names or their culpability. University presidents make important decisions, and should be held accountable for what happens when they cover up a crime. But those people in the locker rooms who allowed the crimes to continue should not get away without justice, having had their bosses stand in their place at the whipping post.
4) Frightening precedence- The NCAA has acted upon and punished a violation of criminal law. I understand the argument about how they aren't punishing the perpetrator (who's name I refuse to put in print) but punishing a 'lack of institutional control' instead. I don't buy it. If that were the case, the same due process that we've seen in the past would take place, and the punishment would fit the 'crime'. (Funny how flippantly we use that word when it really doesn't apply.) That didn't happen here because retribution doesn't feel good after everybody has gotten past the emotions of an injustice. It only feels good when there's still blood in the (shower) water. What the NCAA did was eye-for-an-eye legalism at its finest. I don't think the NCAA should be operating that way. Those people are charged with stopping cheating in collegiate athletics (which they absolutely have not done, but again, that's another blog post). Giving them the precedent to deal with criminal activity, even when restricted to a university setting, should scare the scat out of all of us.
There is a lot more that could be said, but I'll save some of it for later. Right now, we have two sets of victims to deal with- the real victims of the sexual perversion of the perpetrator of the child rape and abuse, and now the fabricated (but real) set of victims (albeit less severe consequences) of those who are drawing blood from innocent people in the effort to cover their rear ends, stick it to 'the man', or in some way try to feel better about themselves in the aftermath of a tragedy. And in the process, the first set of victims (the serious ones) may get overshadowed by all the brouhaha. That would be a third tragedy, but I fear it is unavoidable at this point unless cooler heads prevail.
Let's try and focus on punishing the guilty and supporting the victims rather than hurt a bunch of folks who didn't do anything wrong in the effort to feel better about our (in)actions in light of the scandal.
20 July 2012
Playing the Piano. The WHOLE Piano.
Had to pass this one on. Some people just play the keys. These guys play the PIANO.
13 July 2012
Are We Abandoning Our Kids By Over-Programming Them?
This is a blurb from this blog post on The White Horse Inn. It details some things of import to parents, and notes some bad parenting skill of which I have been guilty in the past. It is a very interesting read. I think more parents are becoming aware of this problem, though not many of us have a lot of great ideas about how to fix it yet. Most of us roll with the punches, learning as we go.One thing I will say: God is sovereign even in this learning process. While we may not want to repeat some of the mistakes we've made, we also feel grateful to have had the experiences and been able to learn from them. Perhaps it will work out like many things did in our own (parents) lives- they'll make sure they don't make the same mistakes we (their parents) made, just like we made sure we didn't make the same mistakes our parents made. In the process, we learn a whole new set of mistakes to make. How's that for irony? Anyway, here's the blurb. Read the whole thing at the link above.
-----
Chap Clark, in his book Hurt, affirms this trend but chooses to use the term “the abandoned child.” He writes, “We have evolved to the point where we believe driving is support, being active is love, and providing any and every opportunity is selfless nurture … Even with the best of intentions, the way we raise, train, and even parent our children today exhibits attitudes and behaviors that are simply subtle forms of parental abandonment.“[1]
Certainly people can evaluate accurately this issue from various angles (psychology, sociology, education, etc.). From a theological position, this parenting style reflects the natural result of life lived intensely under the law. When I mention law in this context, I do not refer to the moral code but to a pattern of life focused on living up to standards through personal performance and effort. A standard of false righteousness- child competence – exists in the culture, and adults employ whatever necessary means (math tutors, batting coaches, personal trainers, academic camps, intense schedules, etc.) to maximize their child’s performance that they may satisfy the expectations.
Researchers have committed much study to the trend of abandonment in teen culture. The literature has identified an intense sense of disconnection and isolation among teens in their family and community systems. While researchers consider high-rates of divorce and general family dysfunction as contributing factors, the primary variable among teens with symptoms of abandonment is over-programming and performance-based lifestyles.
-----
[1] Chap Clark, Hurt (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2004), 46-47.
10 July 2012
Need Something to Do?
I was playing with my Logos software this evening and found a little tool that makes word-find puzzles. Here's one, taken from John 3:1-15, just for fun. You'll probably have to click it to enlarge it enough to see it well. Enjoy.
06 July 2012
597 Years Ago Today...
This story is worth repeating. Go read this blurb on the Logos website about Jan Hus, who was martyred on this date in 1415.
29 June 2012
More on Health Care (or, Moron Healthcare)
There is one logical undeniable ramification to state-sponsored health care: real freedom of religion and federal control of health care CANNOT co-exist in the same legal system.
We've seen ample evidence of this in years past with Medicare, indigent health care, etc. We are about to see a lot more evidence for it, including gross manifestation of the truth of the matter.
Here's more from Atlantic columnist Daniel Epps.
We've seen ample evidence of this in years past with Medicare, indigent health care, etc. We are about to see a lot more evidence for it, including gross manifestation of the truth of the matter.
Here's more from Atlantic columnist Daniel Epps.
Health Care Snippet
Doug Wilson noted this little factoid on his blog today-
"Obamacare was upheld as a tax. This means several things. First, the Constitution requires tax bills to originate in the House, and Obamacare originated in the Senate. A suit should be filed on that basis. Second, this means that Obamacare can now be overturned in the Senate with 51 votes instead of the 60 that were required before."
Interesting.
"Obamacare was upheld as a tax. This means several things. First, the Constitution requires tax bills to originate in the House, and Obamacare originated in the Senate. A suit should be filed on that basis. Second, this means that Obamacare can now be overturned in the Senate with 51 votes instead of the 60 that were required before."
Interesting.
28 June 2012
Health Care Law and The Future
Since the SCOTUS has ruled in favor of Obamacare (not entirely unexpected, though one of the names on the positive side of the decision was), the question becomes, 'What now?'
Here's my prediction: This decision won't be as bad as we fear. I predict that without the SCOTUS to run against, there's now a fair-to-middlin' chance that the democrat incumbent in the White House could lose the election, which is a historically rare occurrence. I also think this will lead to 10-15 additional GOP wins in House elections, and one or two wins in the Senate.
All that said, we now have a SCOTUS precedence that the federal government can tax the people in any amount for any reason. That is certainly is a problem.
We'll see how it goes in November.
Here's my prediction: This decision won't be as bad as we fear. I predict that without the SCOTUS to run against, there's now a fair-to-middlin' chance that the democrat incumbent in the White House could lose the election, which is a historically rare occurrence. I also think this will lead to 10-15 additional GOP wins in House elections, and one or two wins in the Senate.
All that said, we now have a SCOTUS precedence that the federal government can tax the people in any amount for any reason. That is certainly is a problem.
We'll see how it goes in November.
22 June 2012
A Day That Should Live in Infamy, but Doesn't
Today marks the 71st anniversary of an event that should live in infamy in world history, but is rarely mentioned outside Eastern Europe. The event resulted in the deaths of more people than any other event in the history of the world, excepting the Great Flood. Today is the anniversary of Operation Barbarossa.
Barbarossa was the code name for Adolf Hitler's plan to invade and conquer the Soviet Union. 3.9 million German soldiers faced 6 million Soviet troops; by the end of the operation in 1945 there would be between 20 million and 30 million dead, including civilians.
We don't think much about this in the West, but these events shaped the world as we know it, and today must bring painful memories back to millions of people. I watched a movie with my oldest boys night-before-last: Enemy at the Gates. This is a dramatization of a story within the story of the Battle of Stalingrad. It is about a Russian sniper, Vasily Zaitsev. It is a fascinating story with a good amount of historical accuracy in spite of being a dramatization. This movie is NOT suitable for small children...the level of violence is excessive. But for older teens it gives a good idea of what the war was like on the Eastern Front. For those who know little about this aspect of the Second World War, I recommend it.
Here is a trailer for the movie-
Barbarossa was the code name for Adolf Hitler's plan to invade and conquer the Soviet Union. 3.9 million German soldiers faced 6 million Soviet troops; by the end of the operation in 1945 there would be between 20 million and 30 million dead, including civilians.
We don't think much about this in the West, but these events shaped the world as we know it, and today must bring painful memories back to millions of people. I watched a movie with my oldest boys night-before-last: Enemy at the Gates. This is a dramatization of a story within the story of the Battle of Stalingrad. It is about a Russian sniper, Vasily Zaitsev. It is a fascinating story with a good amount of historical accuracy in spite of being a dramatization. This movie is NOT suitable for small children...the level of violence is excessive. But for older teens it gives a good idea of what the war was like on the Eastern Front. For those who know little about this aspect of the Second World War, I recommend it.
Here is a trailer for the movie-
18 June 2012
Land of the Midnight Sun
We just got back from two weeks in Alaska. Here's a photo I took at midnight, just after our plane took off from Ted Stevens Airport, on Friday-
They aren't kidding about midnight sun.
I'll post some more on this in the next few days. Here's our look at Denali from the Talkeetna Lodge-
(I think you can click on these and get a bigger picture.)
They aren't kidding about midnight sun.
I'll post some more on this in the next few days. Here's our look at Denali from the Talkeetna Lodge-
(I think you can click on these and get a bigger picture.)
01 June 2012
When is Plagiarism Not Plagiarism?
I guess we are seeing the logical results of the culture that's been around in colleges and universities for a long time. This response, written by the always-interesting-and-sometimes-provocative Carl Trueman, to this web site which provides 'research services' to pastors, is very interesting.
I suppose there are legitimate reasons for pastors to use such a service, but I can't see how such a service could be financially viable if it was restricted to 'legitimate reasons.' I have a funny feeling, as Trueman hints, that there is a lot more ghost writing going on than meets the eye. In my mind, this kind of ghost writing for sermons is no different than the purchasing of parts (or all) of term papers by college students.
Well, there is one difference: college students who buy their papers will answer for their dishonesty, but pastors who don't do what they are paid to do will answer for their dishonesty as well. I can relate, because sometimes I don't always do everything I'm supposed to do, so I'm guilty of the same thing at times. What really bothers me is these pastors will also answer for their responsibility as teachers, per the New Testament proscription on teaching, cited by Dr. Trueman. That's kinda scary.
I don't want to paint all these pastors with a broad brush as dishonest. Some of the names and faces on the testimonial list are pastors I greatly respect and admire. I'm sure many pastors really do use this service for viable and legitimate reasons. But I think they should be very careful in attaching their endorsement of such a service because of the liability of being associated with those who step over the line of appropriate activity.
It will be interesting to see if this story grows some legs.
I suppose there are legitimate reasons for pastors to use such a service, but I can't see how such a service could be financially viable if it was restricted to 'legitimate reasons.' I have a funny feeling, as Trueman hints, that there is a lot more ghost writing going on than meets the eye. In my mind, this kind of ghost writing for sermons is no different than the purchasing of parts (or all) of term papers by college students.
Well, there is one difference: college students who buy their papers will answer for their dishonesty, but pastors who don't do what they are paid to do will answer for their dishonesty as well. I can relate, because sometimes I don't always do everything I'm supposed to do, so I'm guilty of the same thing at times. What really bothers me is these pastors will also answer for their responsibility as teachers, per the New Testament proscription on teaching, cited by Dr. Trueman. That's kinda scary.
I don't want to paint all these pastors with a broad brush as dishonest. Some of the names and faces on the testimonial list are pastors I greatly respect and admire. I'm sure many pastors really do use this service for viable and legitimate reasons. But I think they should be very careful in attaching their endorsement of such a service because of the liability of being associated with those who step over the line of appropriate activity.
It will be interesting to see if this story grows some legs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)