My oldest kids, twins Will and Brice, who are about to start their senior year of high school, are leaving on Friday for a week of mission work in Ecuador. It was hard to agree to let them go.
I've read, discussed, and even taught about how our own safety isn't the most important factor in how we should make our decisions before a sovereign God. Now it is time to put my money where my mouth is, and let them go, in God's good hands.
Nonetheless, I suspect my prayer life will be a little more active for the next week or so, and I'd appreciate if anyone reading this would throw in a little extra prayer for their safety, as well as their success on the mission field.
Showing posts with label missions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label missions. Show all posts
23 July 2013
03 April 2012
What Do We Do Now?
I ran across a very interesting article on the GC Blog today. It is by Dave Wright, and the original can be found here.
After giving a brief summary of the roots of youth ministry, Dave says the following-
This description parallels pretty closely with what I saw happening in my dealings with youth ministry from the mid-80s on. It didn't seem to matter very much what the denomination was, nor the level of commitment to 'biblical inerrancy' or the conservative/liberal bent of the churches. Everybody was doing the same thing.
Back then, I didn't have Utes of my own, so the process didn't really register on me with any more depth than, 'gee, I wish we'd had this much fun when I was a youth.' Now, I have three teenagers and another soon-to-be. This is very important now. How context matters.
Our own youth ministry has pretty well done away with the attractional model of youth ministry. As a result, the numbers are low. Many of the kids who used to come go to a church down the street where they are still doing rock concerts and throwing food. But those kids aren't being fed. Our kids are, and I'm thankful for that. The big question for the youth leadership is, how can we 'compete' with the attractional models? I understand this isn't really a competition, and so do the pastors at church. But still, it's hard to reach some of the kids who seem to need it the most when they aren't around at any of the events.
I suppose this is a good picture of why non-attractional models must of necessity be missional models. If they won't come to you, you are going to have to go to them. Sure looks that way.
After giving a brief summary of the roots of youth ministry, Dave says the following-
By the early 70s, churches began to realize the need for specialized ministries to teenagers and began hiring youth pastors. Some of these were former staff members from YL and YFC. With this the church imported the relational strategy of the parachurch movement. During the 70s, youth pastors seeking to reach large numbers of youth for the gospel began to employ a more attractional model. Gatherings with food and live music could draw enormous crowds. Churches found that large, vibrant youth groups drew more families to the church, and, therefore, encouraged more attraction-oriented programs. Later in the decade, this writer watched leaders swallowing live goldfish in both the church youth group and local Young Life club when we brought enough friends to reach an attendance target.
By the 80s the emergence of MTV and a media-driven generation meant church youth ministry became more entertainment-driven than ever. Youth pastors felt the need to feature live bands, video production, and elaborate sound and lighting in order to reach this audience. No longer could a pile of burgers or pizzas draw a crowd. By the end of the decade the youth group meeting was being creatively inspired by MTV and game shows on Nickelodeon. The message had been simplified and shortened to fit the entertainment-saturated youth culture. By the start of the 21st century, we discovered many youth were no longer interested in the show that we put on or the oversimplified message. Christianity was no different from the world around them. Some youth ministries intensified their effort combining massive hype with strong messages that inspired youth but did not translate to everyday life. We realized we were faced with a generation whose faith was unsustainable.
The Result
What happened in all that? First, we moved from parachurch to church-based ministry (though the parachurch continues). In doing so, we segregated youth from the rest of the congregation. Students in many churches no longer engaged with "adult" church and had no place to go once they graduated from high school. They did not benefit from intergenerational relationships but instead were relegated to the youth room.
Second, we incorporated an attractional model that morphed into entertainment-driven ministry. In doing that we bought into the fallacy of "edu-tainment" as a legitimate means of communicating the gospel. Obscuring the gospel has communicated that we have to dress up Jesus to make him cool.
Third, we lost sight of the Great Commission, deciding instead to make converts of many and disciples of few. We concluded that strong biblical teaching and helping students embrace a robust theology was boring (or only relevant to the exceptionally keen) and proverbially shot ourselves in the foot.
Fourth, we created a consumer mentality amongst a generation that did not expect to be challenged at church in ways similar to what they face at school or on sports teams. The frightening truth is that youth ministry books and training events were teaching us to do the exact methods that have failed us. The major shapers of youth ministry nationally were teaching us the latest games and selling us big events with the assumption that we would work some content in there somewhere. In the midst of all this, church leaders and parents came to expect that successful youth ministry is primarily about having fun and attracting large crowds. Those youth pastors in recent decades who were determined to put the Bible at the center of their work faced an uphill battle not only against the prevailing youth culture but against the leadership of the church as well.
The task before us is enormous. We need to change the way we pass the faith to the next generation. Believing in the sufficiency of Scripture, we must turn to the Bible to teach us how to do ministry (rather than just what to teach). Students need gospel-centered ministries grounded in the Word of God.
This description parallels pretty closely with what I saw happening in my dealings with youth ministry from the mid-80s on. It didn't seem to matter very much what the denomination was, nor the level of commitment to 'biblical inerrancy' or the conservative/liberal bent of the churches. Everybody was doing the same thing.
Back then, I didn't have Utes of my own, so the process didn't really register on me with any more depth than, 'gee, I wish we'd had this much fun when I was a youth.' Now, I have three teenagers and another soon-to-be. This is very important now. How context matters.
Our own youth ministry has pretty well done away with the attractional model of youth ministry. As a result, the numbers are low. Many of the kids who used to come go to a church down the street where they are still doing rock concerts and throwing food. But those kids aren't being fed. Our kids are, and I'm thankful for that. The big question for the youth leadership is, how can we 'compete' with the attractional models? I understand this isn't really a competition, and so do the pastors at church. But still, it's hard to reach some of the kids who seem to need it the most when they aren't around at any of the events.
I suppose this is a good picture of why non-attractional models must of necessity be missional models. If they won't come to you, you are going to have to go to them. Sure looks that way.
10 October 2011
Not Creative, But Faithful
I love this paragraph from Michael Horton's The Gospel Commission:
Sometimes I think one of the biggest problems of evangelicalism in our culture is our own emphasis on individuality that leads us to all kinds of creative ways of expressing what we think the Bible teaches. The problem with this is, we are fallen creatures and what we think the Bible teaches is more often than not flawed. If we ignore the faithful witness of church history (and who even cares about church history anymore...we can't even respect a hymn if it was written more than sixty days ago!), we are not only prone, but defaulted, to err in our creativity.
We, as witnesses to Christ's kingdom, are not called to be creative, but faithful. We absolutely cannot be faithful unless we are saturated in the Word (scripture) and diligent in the study of our history of thought. Those who ignore their theological history are doomed to (heretically) repeat it.
We must never take Christ's work for granted. The gospel is not merely something we take to unbelievers; it is the Word that created and continues to sustain the whole church in its earthly pilgrimage. In addition, we must never confuse Christ's work with our own. There is a lot of loose talk these days about our "living the gospel" or even "being the gospel," as if our lives were the Good News. We even hear it said that the church is an extension of Christ's incarnation and redeeming work, as if Jesus came to provide the moral example or template and we are called to complete his work. But there is one Savior and one head of the church. To him alone all authority is given in heaven and on earth. There is only one incarnation of God in history, and he finished the work of fulfilling all righteousness, bearing the curse, and triumphing over sin and death.
Sometimes I think one of the biggest problems of evangelicalism in our culture is our own emphasis on individuality that leads us to all kinds of creative ways of expressing what we think the Bible teaches. The problem with this is, we are fallen creatures and what we think the Bible teaches is more often than not flawed. If we ignore the faithful witness of church history (and who even cares about church history anymore...we can't even respect a hymn if it was written more than sixty days ago!), we are not only prone, but defaulted, to err in our creativity.
We, as witnesses to Christ's kingdom, are not called to be creative, but faithful. We absolutely cannot be faithful unless we are saturated in the Word (scripture) and diligent in the study of our history of thought. Those who ignore their theological history are doomed to (heretically) repeat it.
17 February 2011
Help a Pastor in the Philippines
Tom Ascol, over on the Founder's Ministries blog, tells this story about a pastor in the Philippines who lost everything in a recent flood. Founder's is helping him replace his theology library, which he uses to teach over there.
I donated a little toward this project and encourage you to do a little bit as well. Even ten or fifteen dollars will buy a book for him, and ensure the continued spread of the gospel by allowing young pastors to be educated there. (Click the link above to donate...it will take you to PayPal for a safe place to execute the donation by credit card.)
I emailed Tom directly to confirm this was a real situation and not some kind of internet scam. Tom told me he has known this pastor for several years and it is indeed the real deal.
I donated a little toward this project and encourage you to do a little bit as well. Even ten or fifteen dollars will buy a book for him, and ensure the continued spread of the gospel by allowing young pastors to be educated there. (Click the link above to donate...it will take you to PayPal for a safe place to execute the donation by credit card.)
I emailed Tom directly to confirm this was a real situation and not some kind of internet scam. Tom told me he has known this pastor for several years and it is indeed the real deal.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)